88th Academy Awards – From the Big Screen to the Small Screen.


The entrance to the Dolby theater in Los Angeles was again awash with red carpet, cacophonous with media scrimmaging and illuminated with the brightest stars, as it hosted the 88th Academy Award ceremony. The traditional media glare lit up the glamorous veneers of the actors of the most acclaimed movies of the year as they entered the auditorium to await the Academy’s selection. But once the dust had settled from a night which addressed issues from race, domestic violence, global warming to the traditional gossip of fashion hits and misses, rating results revealed the ceremony was the lowest-rated Academy Awards in eight years. So what happened? The ingredients of High fashion coupled with school yard gossip which fuels channels such as E! hitched to the anticipation of the Academy’s response to socio-demographic issues which preempted the event, appeared to make for a ceremony which catered to all possible viewing demographics? The answer to such a poor ratings may lye not in how engaging the content of the ceremony was, but in how the content is being engaged.

While ABC executives may be meeting over the next few days to address the rating slump, the topic of social media will no doubt arise in their discussions. The ABC network results are down 8% and 5% respectively in total viewership and the key demographic from last years event. Contrarily social media feeds were awash with Oscar related news and content. Facebook, the original social media juggernaut, appears to be becoming the primary news resource for the modern age. Replacing the newsstand, it is becoming the hub of the traditional press, and their go to medium on how to reach their readers. For example Print giants such as the Guardian and the Times promoted their live blog heavily on Facebook to receive traffic. Large discussions on the ceremony also took place in the comment sections of Oscar related posts.

While traditional media are commenting via live blogs online their potential audience are conversing on Twitter about the show. With ceremony related hashtags such as #OscarsSoWhite, in relations to host Chris Rocks initial monologue addressing of the lack of black nominees which he continued to jab at throughout the event, trending world wide. Widespread vindication for Leonardo Di Caprio finally receiving the best actor award was also made clear on the platform along with other discussions about the ceremony.

Twitter Image.PNG

Whilst Facebook and Twitter are keeping the conversation of the event going, ABC and other networks must compete with platforms such as Instagram and Snapchat which are offering behind the scenes insight which television networks cannot offer. Be it the individual updates actors are posting of their experience, or the Oscars themselves offering behind stage preparation and content on Instagram it offers a unique perspective of the event for followers.Leo Oscar.PNG

Snapchat also had running stories of the pre-show, ceremony and the Vanity Fair after party available for the app users, again offering content which television networks simply cannot compete with.

So to return to the meeting of ABC executives this week in a New York skyscraper, as they discuss the future for their coverage of the event, Social media will be a central theme on how to reverse the ratings slump. With the content of the show generating interest across social media platforms for the following hours and days, the drama and glitz of the event are as attractive and enticing ever. But the move to viewing the content from the television screen to the small screen appears to be the greatest threat to the Networks coverage of the event. With research showing that content is being viewed on multiple screens simultaneously in the modern household, entertainment companies have developed itself across many platforms as a result. But the future may point to a return to the viewing of just one screen, the small screen.



Re marketing. Useful marketing tool or cyber stalking?

Remarketing. Think of re-marketing like this: you use marketing to bring a visitor to your website, and if he or she doesn’t make a purchase, you then use re-marketing to bring the visitor back to your website and convert him or her in to a paying customer. Remarketing has blown up since the initiation of Google AdWords in 2010. Google AdWords allows the user to connect with users based on past interactions with your website as they surf sites within the Google Content Network. It allows the user to provide another avenue to reconnect with people who showed interest in products or services in the past on their webpage.

This is an incredible tool for marketers to use! To have the ability to specifically reach people who have shown an interest in your page and bring them back, is almost a digital form of having the exit from your store leading to the entrance of your store. Through the utilisation of cookies.(What are computer cookies!?!?!) Here is a great video of hoe to set up remarketing for your website.

This is great news for marketers. But what about the consumer? Do I want every website I visit to forever target me anytime I go online.
This is a hot topic with regards to peoples privacy online. Marketers will say there is nothing stopping them from posting a promotional leaflet to your mail box so why shouldn’t that apply to online? The flip side of the coin being can we no longer search the net without being targeted to purchase something from every site we visit? The debate will continue but with scope of opportunity remarketing is currently offering, there looks to be no decline in its usage by organisations in the coming future.

Snapchat, Just a Fad?

Snapchat is currently making waves in the communication sector. The app recently came to prominence in the business world in late 2013, when Facebook were reported to have made a bid to purchase the app for $3 billion dollars, which the organisation rejected. So what is Snapchat?

Snapchat is a free, photo messaging app used by smart phone users to send pictures to each other.These pictures are time restricted by the sender of the message, and can be sent to people that are added as friends on the app. Snapchat also has a feature that allows the user to make a collection of photos called ‘My Story’ that allows their friends on the network to view their ‘story’ for up to 24 hours. The relative simplicity of the app, and competition from similar apps often leads people to ask, why would Facebook offer $3 billion dollars for the app? The statistics behind the success of Snapchat and the move in general, from text to visual, can give us an insight into their reasons.

Established in September 2011, Snapchat has grown exponentially as a communication tool, and in the US alone is reported to have 26 million users in the latest report, with worldwide users purported to be 60 million and ever growing. Reports have shown that there are over 30 million snaps sent a day on the app. This huge volume of users makes Snapchat a very fetching opportunity for businesses to communicate with prospective customers, with businesses now establishing themselves on Snapchat for that very reason. Moreover the move from text communication to visual looks to  be the trend for the future.


With the trend on social media indicating a shift from textual interaction to visual, on first look Snapchat appears to be in a strong position going into the future. The success of Instagram, Flipboard and the move from twitter recently to a move image based interface all point towards to communication of the future being through images. But Snapchats proposed dominance of future communications will not be as easy as appears.

‘Whatsapp’, the free communication tool with 450 milion users, was just this year purchased by Facebook for $19 billion. After Snapchat rejected Facebook’s advances their deal to purchase WhatsApp appears to show that Facebook plans to mount an assault on instant communication and dominate the market. With the reincarnation of Bebo, the former social media giant (the company also plans to attack the instant communication market) along with Vine, there appears to be a great deal of competition in the market and an all out war between these organisations appears to be the only way we will find who will rule as King of communication. Who will win, who knows? But with its simple and user friendly platform, large user base and its current free installation Snapchat has, the app stands every chance of succeeding and avoiding being just another fad like the¬†tamagotchi.